Tiffany Employee Filed Lawsuit for Genetic Discrimination

By Leeds Brown Law | March 27, 2017

The Genetic Nondiscrimination Information Act Protects Employees

There have not been many cases filed under the Genetic Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA). Under this federal law, employers with 15 or more employees may not use your genetic information in the following ways:

  • To limit, segregate, classify or mistreat an employee or
  • To make employment decisions regarding things such as compensation, hiring, firing or promoting.

In other words, your employer may not use genetic test results or your family health history to make decisions related to your employment. While there are times an employer may legally possess knowledge of your genetic condition, it may not use the information to make an employment decision or discriminate and must keep the information private.

Woman Files GINA Lawsuit in Federal Court

November 18, 2016, Lisa O’Rourke filed a lawsuit against Tiffany & Co. (Tiffany), alleging the New York-based company discriminated against her because of her genetic predisposition for developing cancer. Ms. O’Rourke was an employee of the Rhode Island manufacturing facility where she worked as the director of strategic sourcing. Her maternal grandmother and aunt died of breast cancer, and when her mother tested positive for the gene mutation that results in an elevated risk of developing cancer, she got tested too. Ms. O’Rourke tested positive for the genetic mutation. She ultimately chose to have surgeries that her lawyer says “were life-saving.”

Ms. O’Rourke underwent operations to remove her breasts and ovaries in 2014 and alleges that she informed Tiffany she would need to undergo additional surgeries. She returned to work and scheduled her next surgery. Tiffany, O’Rourke claims, asked her to delay the procedure because she was out of Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) time but eventually told her that they would hold her job. When she returned from that surgery, she advised Tiffany that she would need to schedule another leave for additional surgery. One month later, Tiffany informed her they were eliminating her position at the company. They offered her a different job with less responsibility and compensation which she declined.

O’Rourke will have to demonstrate to the court that Tiffany’s decision to eliminate her job was the result of discrimination and not the product of legitimate business concerns.

The lawsuit asks the court to grant punitive damages, back pay and attorney’s fees.

Discrimination Charges Under GINA on the Rise

While there have not yet been many court cases alleging genetic discrimination under GINA, the number of claims submitted to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is growing. From 2010-2014, charges filed with the EEOC under GINA increased 60%, from 201 to 333. This increase may be partially due to the use of wellness incentive programs at many companies. The EEOC has intimated that some employers’ wellness programs discriminate against disabled individuals or those with genetic predispositions that prevent the individuals from participating in the programs. Wellness programs are currently the EEOC’s focus when it comes to enforcing GINA.

Contact Us

It remains to be seen how O’Rourke’s case gets resolved but it serves as a reminder to employees that genetic conditions and genetic information are protected by law. Your employer may not use your genetic information to discriminate against you.

Contact Leeds Brown Law, P.C., representing clients in New York City, Long Island, and the entire metropolitan area, if you have any questions about employment discrimination you may be experiencing. Our full-service workplace discrimination firm has decades of experience handling all types of claims under federal, state and city law. We can be reached 24/7 at 1-800-585-4658.



Free Consultation


Shortly after beginning medical school, I experienced some academic difficulties. After seeing my physicians, I was diagnosed with ADHD. After I started receiving specific treatment for ADHD, I requested the school to accommodate me for the disability as recommended by my physician. One of the requests made was for extended time to take my exams. The extension of time was granted...

~Kenneth Broodo, Esq.

Partner at Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP
I hired Lenard Leeds, Esq. to assist me with my wrongful termination. I was let go of my position because of my age. I was not only told to take a decrease in pay but also required to work fewer hours to do the same job. Additionally, they kept asking me “When are you going to retire?” I visited the...


I want to thank you again for assisting me in overseeing my issues with my employer. This is the second time I have used Lenard Leeds, Esq. to fight for me. This time I was a National Sales Manager of a drug company, where acts of discrimination based on my age, national origin and retaliation took place. Mr. Leeds and...

~Law Professor

Discrimination Case

$19 Million

Settlement Secured in a National Origin
View More

Request Free Consultation

Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.


One Old Country Road, Suite 347 Carle Place, NY 11514


get directions


101 Greenwich Street, 22nd Floor New York, NY 10006


get directions
Call Now!