Failure to Provide Goods and Services Based on National Origin or Religion

National origin and religion are not protected classes under Title VII, so discrimination based on these factors is so rampant in the United States. In this article, we will discuss what constitutes discrimination based on national origin or religion according to federal law and state law for California. We will also provide examples of cases that have been prosecuted for protecting individuals from such discriminatory practices.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination by employers, employment agencies, labor organizations, and any person connected to hiring practices. The act also protects employees who are discriminated against because they complain about unfair treatment at work. However, Title VII does not cover all instances where an individual is subject to national origin or religious-based discrimination; the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) enforces laws prohibiting job bias under these categories. To be considered a protected class under Title VII’s provisions on national origin-based discriminatory actions, individuals must have birthplace outside United States territory or citizenship that includes birthright privileges granted to foreigners. Therefore if an employee was born inside the U.S., but one parent was foreign-born, they may still be protected under Title VII.
On the other hand, religion falls into a different category and is not limited to creed or tenets of faith that can be seen as discriminating against others; individuals must show their religious beliefs are sincerely held for them to receive protection from unfair treatment based on this factor alone.
It is illegal to discriminate against an employee in California because they belong to a particular race or color group (CA Civil Code 51). The state also has laws protecting employees who need time off due to medical conditions related to pregnancy (C.A. Government Code 12945) and those whose place of national origin may make them subject to discriminatory employment practices (Labor Codes 1171-1179). State law prohibits employers with five or more workers from making employment decisions based on race, color, religion, or national origin.
In December of 2017, a Houston man filed a lawsuit against the iconic fast-food restaurant Chick-Fil-A for religious discrimination after being fired from his position as manager at the company’s location in Humble, Texas, only nine days into his new job. The defendant allegedly believed that because the plaintiff is Muslim and fasting during Ramadan thus could not work an overnight shift required by promotion to branch manager. While there have been no updates since this case was first reported last, it demonstrates how difficult it can be to prove these types of claims even when employees believe they are experiencing discriminatory practices due to their nationality or creed.


At Ku Klux Klan gatherings, a Klansman lets different individuals know that Mexicans and Puerto Ricans ought to go “back where they came from.” They consume across in the front yard of a young Hispanic couple to startle them and power them to leave the area. Before finishing the cross, the litigant shows a firearm and gives one of his companions one more weapon if the casualties attempt to stop them.
An American organization initiates laborers in a tiny Mexican town, promising them great work at a significant salary. The organization sneaks the Mexicans to the United States in an empty big hauler truck. When the last show up in the U.S., the laborers are compromised, informed that they will be killed if they leave their plant.
The Criminal Section of the Civil Rights Division prosecutes individuals who are blamed for utilizing power or savagery to meddle with an individual’s governmentally ensured privileges resulting from that individual’s public beginning. These freedoms incorporate regions like lodging, work, instruction, or utilization of public offices. You can arrive at the Criminal Section at (202) 514-3204 or write to:
U.S. Department of Justice
Civil Rights Division
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Criminal Section, PHB
Washington, D.C. 20530

Free Consultation


Shortly after beginning medical school, I experienced some academic difficulties. After seeing my physicians, I was diagnosed with ADHD. After I started receiving specific treatment for ADHD, I requested the school to accommodate me for the disability as recommended by my physician. One of the requests made was for extended time to take my exams. The extension of time was granted...

~Kenneth Broodo, Esq.

Partner at Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP
I hired Lenard Leeds, Esq. to assist me with my wrongful termination. I was let go of my position because of my age. I was not only told to take a decrease in pay but also required to work fewer hours to do the same job. Additionally, they kept asking me “When are you going to retire?” I visited the...


I want to thank you again for assisting me in overseeing my issues with my employer. This is the second time I have used Lenard Leeds, Esq. to fight for me. This time I was a National Sales Manager of a drug company, where acts of discrimination based on my age, national origin and retaliation took place. Mr. Leeds and...

~Law Professor

Discrimination Case

$19 Million

Settlement Secured in a National Origin
View More

Request Free Consultation

Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.


One Old Country Road, Suite 347 Carle Place, NY 11514


get directions


101 Greenwich Street, 22nd Floor New York, NY 10006


get directions
Call Now!